Re: [PATCH][RESEND] PIE randomization

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 4 Jul 2007, Jakub Jelinek wrote:

> The above highlighted changes are the cause of random segfaults of PIE 
> binaries.  See 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246623 

Thanks a lot for pointing this out. Andrew, could this be folded into 
pie-randomization.patch please?


From: Jiri Kosina <[email protected]>

pie randomization: fix BAD_ADDR macro

pie-randomization.patch makes the load_addr in load_elf_interp() the load 
bias of ld.so (difference between the actual load base address and first 
PT_LOAD segment's p_vaddr). If the difference equals (on x86) to 
0xfffff000 (which is valid [1]), SIGSEGV is incorrectly sent.

This patch changes the BAD_ADDR so that it catches the mappings to the 
error-area properly.

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246623

Reported-by: Jakub Jelinek <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <[email protected]>

diff --git a/fs/binfmt_elf.c b/fs/binfmt_elf.c
index da270d1..466477d 100644
--- a/fs/binfmt_elf.c
+++ b/fs/binfmt_elf.c
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static struct linux_binfmt elf_format = {
 		.hasvdso	= 1
 };
 
-#define BAD_ADDR(x) ((unsigned long)(x) >= PAGE_MASK)
+#define BAD_ADDR(x) IS_ERR_VALUE(x)
 
 static int set_brk(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
 {
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux