On 7/4/07, Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 11:58:40AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > while (np->put_rx.orig != less_rx) {
> > - struct sk_buff *skb = dev_alloc_skb(np->rx_buf_sz + NV_RX_ALLOC_PAD);
> > + struct sk_buff *skb = dev_alloc_skb_node(np->rx_buf_sz + NV_RX_ALLOC_PAD, dev_to_node(&dev->dev));
>
> If we're going to do this then it would probably make sense to change
> dev_alloc_skb_node() so that it takes a `struct net_device *' rather than a
> bare node-id. That's a call which the net guys will need to make, which is
> why we cc them on our emails.
That thing is called netdev_alloc_skb and already exists. And it's indeed
what they should be using in the rx path.
-
please check
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/3/418
[PATCH 3/4] net: make forcedeth to use kmalloc_node and
__netdev_alloc_skb for skb allocation
but need to replace __netdev_alloc_skb to netdev_alloc_skb.
YH
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]