Re: [PATCH 2/4] net: use numa_node in net_devcice->dev instead of parent

["Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>]

On 7/4/07, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
> Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 09:51:20 +0100
>
> > On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 05:30:51PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > > [PATCH 2/4] net: use numa_node in net_devcice->dev instead of parent
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai.lu@sun.com>
> > > diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
> > > index 27cfe5f..005cc1c 100644
> > > --- a/net/core/skbuff.c
> > > +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
> > > @@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ nodata:
> > >  struct sk_buff *__netdev_alloc_skb(struct net_device *dev,
> > >             unsigned int length, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> > >  {
> > > -   int node = dev->dev.parent ? dev_to_node(dev->dev.parent) : -1;
> > > +   int node = dev_to_node(&dev->dev);
> >
> > This looks wrong to me unless the device model has once again changed
> > silently.  When I wrote this code &dev->dev was a device allocated
> > as part of the netdevice and the parent is the pci (or whatever) device
> > that has the node information.
>
> Correct, this change is completely bogus.
> -

please check that with

http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/3/419

[PATCH 1/4] try parent numa_node at first before using default

YH
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/