Re: [PATCH 2/4] net: use numa_node in net_devcice->dev instead of parent

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/4/07, David Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 09:51:20 +0100

> On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 05:30:51PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > [PATCH 2/4] net: use numa_node in net_devcice->dev instead of parent
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <[email protected]>
> > diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
> > index 27cfe5f..005cc1c 100644
> > --- a/net/core/skbuff.c
> > +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
> > @@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ nodata:
> >  struct sk_buff *__netdev_alloc_skb(struct net_device *dev,
> >             unsigned int length, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> >  {
> > -   int node = dev->dev.parent ? dev_to_node(dev->dev.parent) : -1;
> > +   int node = dev_to_node(&dev->dev);
>
> This looks wrong to me unless the device model has once again changed
> silently.  When I wrote this code &dev->dev was a device allocated
> as part of the netdevice and the parent is the pci (or whatever) device
> that has the node information.

Correct, this change is completely bogus.
-

please check that with

http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/3/419

[PATCH 1/4] try parent numa_node at first before using default

YH
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux