Re: [PATCH] x86: make SMP locks handling interact properly with CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA (2nd try)

On Wednesday 04 July 2007 17:41:39 Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Jan Beulich wrote:
> > Instead of suppressing the change of .text to become readonly, make
> > the SMP locks patching code properly adjust/restore the page access
> > rights.
> >   
> 
> I guess we'll need to do the same thing for paravirt_ops patching?

Not if the patching happens early enough at boot. That's true for Xen
and lguest, but I'm not sure about VMI

-Andi

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] x86: make SMP locks handling interact properly with CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA (2nd try)
    • From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] x86: make SMP locks handling interact properly with CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA (2nd try)
    • From: "Jan Beulich" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] x86: make SMP locks handling interact properly with CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA (2nd try)
    • From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH -mm 5/9] netconsole: Introduce dev_status member
• Next by Date: Re: Some NCQ numbers...
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] x86: make SMP locks handling interact properly with CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA (2nd try)
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] x86: make SMP locks handling interact properly with CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA (2nd try)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]