Rafael J. Wysocki writes: > Still, do you really think that we're ready to drop it _right_ _now_ (I'm > referring to suspend only) and if so than on what basis (except that you > don't like it, which falls short of being a techical argument)? The basis is that it (the freezer) causes more deadlocks and other problems than it avoids, so it's a net win to remove it. Paul. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- The big suspend mess
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
- The big suspend mess
- References:
- [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- From: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- Prev by Date: Re: pci hidden behind transparent bridge
- Next by Date: Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- Next by thread: Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- Index(es):
 |