Re: 2.6.22-rc7: known regressions with patches

On Wed, 4 Jul 2007, Andi Kleen wrote:
> 
> Linus, also what about the revert of the HPET reservation? That would
> fix a clear regression too.

Thanks for reminding me. It probably isn't much of a regression any more 
(since we added the code to not use the HPET when it doesn't seem to be 
working), but yes, that should go in too.

Applied and pushed out. Now we just need people to test and verify that 
the regressions are gone..

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • 2.6.22-rc7: known regressions with patches
    • From: Michal Piotrowski <[email protected]>
  • Re: 2.6.22-rc7: known regressions with patches
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: 2.6.22-rc7: known regressions with patches
    • From: Björn Steinbrink <[email protected]>
  • Re: 2.6.22-rc7: known regressions with patches
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: 2.6.22-rc6-mm1: BUG_ON() mm/memory.c, vm_insert_pfn(), filemap_xip.c, and spufs
• Next by Date: Re: Don't miss the ARM-scsi fix.
• Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.22-rc7: known regressions with patches
• Next by thread: [patch 0/3] Use DATA_DATA in cris, powerpc and xtensa
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]