Re: [PATCH][isapnp] Fix a potential NULL pointer dereference in isapnp_read_tag()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/07/07, Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sun, 1 Jul 2007 01:38:31 +0200
Jesper Juhl <[email protected]> wrote:

> The Coverity checker spotted (as bug #809) that we dereference 'type'
> long before we actually test it against NULL in
> drivers/pnp/isapnp/core.c::isapnp_read_tag() - both branches of the
> 'if (tag & 0x80)' dereference type, and since this 'if' is before the test
> against NULL and the return of -1, this will blow up is ever type is NULL.
> This is easy to fix by simply moving the NULL test to the beginning of
> the function.
>
[snip]

dood, look at the callers.  NULL is not possible here.

You are right, there's absolutely no way that we could get a NULL
pointer there - that was sloppy of me :-(

I guess we should just get rid of the check completely.  I'll cook up
a patch for that tomorrow.

--
Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
Don't top-post  http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please      http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux