Re: [EXT4 set 4][PATCH 1/5] i_version:64 bit inode version

On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 10:58:33AM -0400, Mingming Cao wrote:
> Trond or Bruce, can you please review these patch series and ack if you
> agrees?

Thanks, looks like what we need!

How will nfsd tell whether it can really on a given filesystem's
i_version, or whether it should fall back on ctime?

> As to performance concerns that raise before the inode version counter
> (at least for ext4) is done inside ext4_mark_inode_dirty), so there is
> no extra IO work to store this counter to disk.

So what's the motivation for the "noversion" mount option?

--b.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [EXT4 set 4][PATCH 1/5] i_version:64 bit inode version
    • From: Andreas Dilger <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [EXT4 set 4][PATCH 1/5] i_version:64 bit inode version
    • From: Mingming Cao <[email protected]>
  • Re: [EXT4 set 4][PATCH 1/5] i_version:64 bit inode version
    • From: Mingming Cao <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [ANNOUNCE] util-linux-ng 2.13-rc1
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Input: Support for a less exclusive grab.
• Previous by thread: Re: [EXT4 set 4][PATCH 1/5] i_version:64 bit inode version
• Next by thread: Re: [EXT4 set 4][PATCH 1/5] i_version:64 bit inode version
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]