On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 23:32 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Still, do you really think that we're ready to drop it _right_ _now_ > (I'm > referring to suspend only) and if so than on what basis (except that > you > don't like it, which falls short of being a techical argument)? Works fine for me without it ;-) Ben. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- References:
- [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- From: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- Prev by Date: Re: [EXT4 set 4][PATCH 4/5] i_version:ext4 inode version update
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.22-rc7: known regressions with patches
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- Index(es):
 |