Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 11:58:40 -0700
Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 13:30:36 -0700
Yinghai Lu <[email protected]> wrote:
[PATCH 2/2] net: make net and forcedeth to use kmalloc_node
Please copy [email protected] on net patches.
This patch modifies a net driver as well as the networking core. These
subsytems have different maintainers who run different development trees.
Consequently I must split your patch into two and change their titles and
changelogs appropriately.
Please do this for us in future, thanks.
diff --git a/drivers/net/forcedeth.c b/drivers/net/forcedeth.c
index 42ba1c0..6d53b52 100644
--- a/drivers/net/forcedeth.c
+++ b/drivers/net/forcedeth.c
@@ -1383,7 +1383,7 @@ static int nv_alloc_rx(struct net_device *dev)
less_rx = np->last_rx.orig;
while (np->put_rx.orig != less_rx) {
- struct sk_buff *skb = dev_alloc_skb(np->rx_buf_sz + NV_RX_ALLOC_PAD);
+ struct sk_buff *skb = dev_alloc_skb_node(np->rx_buf_sz + NV_RX_ALLOC_PAD, dev_to_node(&dev->dev));
If we're going to do this then it would probably make sense to change
dev_alloc_skb_node() so that it takes a `struct net_device *' rather than a
bare node-id. That's a call which the net guys will need to make, which is
why we cc them on our emails.
The driver should use netdev_alloc_skb. That routine is supposed to be overriden
on architecture's that need per node changes.
do you mean:
use dev_alloc_skb_node for numa arch.
and other non numa will use macro or static inline to dev_alloc_skb
YH
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
