> Actually, spinlock_t is not suitable. Because spin_unlcok() does NOT imply
> mb(). The subsequent wait_event_timeout()->atomic_read() may leak into the
> critical section.
>
> We can use set_mb(), if we don't want to play with smp_mb() by hand :)
spin_unlock implies a smp_wmb() but yeah, not a full mb(), though having
a read leak into a critical section is generally not an issue.
Ben.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]