On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 05:10:08PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> No, no -- you have it exactly backwards. Removing the freezer turns
> STR into something _less_ like runtime suspend, because it adds the
> requirement that devices must not automatically be resumed when an I/O
> request arrives.
But that's fine - "Are we undergoing a systemwide suspend" is an easy
question to ask. Freezing processes instead means that most of those
paths will never be tested.
--
Matthew Garrett | [email protected]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
