On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 05:20:44PM +0200, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 01:40:31AM -0400, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 01:35:05AM -0400, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > On Tuesday 12 June 2007 01:23, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 01:19:59AM -0400, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Like I said I would love if xf86-input-evdev did not grab the > > > > > device at all. > > > > > > > > We have to disable the legacy input handlers somehow, not doing so > > > > simply isn't an option. > > > > > > I do not follow. If user's xorg.conf does not use /dev/input/mice and > > > does not use "kbd" driver then grabbing is not required, is it? Now, > > > as far as I understand, lack of hotplug support in X is the main > > > obstacle for removing "mouse" and "kbd" drivers, correct? > > > > Sadly, not quite. > > > > The problem is that if the user is not using the mouse and kbd drivers > > at all, but is instead using xf86-input-evdev, and no grabbing is done, > > then all key presses end up going to the console. > > X still switches to its own VT, so those keys go to the X server via the > console, and GPM also knows about console switching ... > > That is a sane way how to prevent the regular console from getting > keypresses/mouse movements. Not really, what happens when the user presses alt-F1? A way to tell the kernel that events from a given input device should not go to the console has been needed since the very first time an X driver allowed keyboard events from /dev/input/event<n>, and that still has not changed. We just want a more flexible approach then what we are already using[0]. I'll see about writing something up when I get back to my computers[1] and have things set back up[2]. Zephaniah E. Hull. 0: EVIOCGRAB. 1: The night of the 10th. 2: It could be a few days after I get back.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Input: Support for a less exclusive grab.
- From: Ryan Lortie <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Input: Support for a less exclusive grab.
- From: Vojtech Pavlik <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Input: Support for a less exclusive grab.
- References:
- Re: [PATCH] Input: Support for a less exclusive grab.
- From: Vojtech Pavlik <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Input: Support for a less exclusive grab.
- Prev by Date: [patch 05/10] Immediate Values - kprobe header fix
- Next by Date: Re: any known issues with leap seconds in 2.6.10?
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Input: Support for a less exclusive grab.
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Input: Support for a less exclusive grab.
- Index(es):