Re: shouldn't LVM support be selected by default?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 3 Jul 2007, Bodo Eggert wrote:

> Robert P. J. Day <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >   just built a new kernel and didn't notice that support for LVM
> > wasn't selected by default for x86.  given what i thought was fairly
> > widespread use of LVM2, wouldn't it make sense to have this option as
> > part of the default config?
>
> If you don't know about LVM, you don't need it. Do you?

well, ok, i can go with that.  thanks.

rday
-- 
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
========================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux