Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway

On Tuesday, 3 July 2007 14:13, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 08:13:53AM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> 
> > Only if you want to audit all character devices' read() and write()
> > methods for races against suspend().
> > / on fuse is a bad idea.
> 
> Any driver that assumes that userspace will be frozen during suspend has 
> been broken forever. That behaviour has never been guaranteed.

Can we please fix those drivers _first_, then?

Rafael


-- 
"Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
    • From: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
    • From: Oliver Neukum <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
    • From: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]