Re: Does the kernel HPET support has problems or the hwclock from util-linux?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "rae l" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Does the kernel HPET support has problems or the hwclock from util-linux?
From: Ismail Dönmez <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 13:21:58 +0300
Cc: "Adrian Bunk" <[email protected]>, "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <[email protected]>
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
Organization: TUBITAK/UEKAE
References: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: KMail/1.9.7

On Monday 02 July 2007 13:15:40 rae l wrote:
> from this address, I know util-linux-2.12r is the latest:
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/util-linux/util-linux-2.12r.lsm

util-linux is now maintained @ http://userweb.kernel.org/~kzak/util-linux-ng/

/ismail

-- 
Perfect is the enemy of good

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

References:
- Does the kernel HPET support has problems or the hwclock from util-linux?
  - From: "rae l" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: instrumentation and kprobes really still "EXPERIMENTAL"?
Next by Date: Re: [i386] Questions regarding provisional page tables initialization
Previous by thread: Does the kernel HPET support has problems or the hwclock from util-linux?
Next by thread: Re: Does the kernel HPET support has problems or the hwclock from util-linux?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux