Re: instrumentation and kprobes really still "EXPERIMENTAL"?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Abhishek Sagar wrote:

> On 7/1/07, Robert P. J. Day <[email protected]> wrote:
> > isn't kprobes mature enough to not be considered experimental anymore?
>
> That would vary from arch to arch.

fair enough.  however, at the very least, i'm thinking that the entire
"Instrumentation support" submenu can be made non-EXPERIMENTAL, while
individual entries therein can be EXPERIMENTAL on a choice-by-choice
basis or something like that.

anyway, others are welcome to play with that as they see fit.

rday
-- 
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
========================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux