Re: [PATCH] cross-architecture ELF clean up

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sam Ravnborg wrote:
Grouping related things together is always a good approach. But the right
factor should be used for the grouping. For the ELF file is would from a usage
perspective be natural to have constants close to the definition that
they are used to describe. Having constants grouped with other constants just
_because_ they are constants does not cut here.

Many ELF constants are used without direct reference to their corresponding structures. My linux/elf-const.h header is just a generalization of the existing linux/elf-em.h header, which just contained the ELF EM_* constants. Given that there seems to be a preexisting need for the EM_* constants in a separate header, and having a separate elf-*.h for each group of constants is a bad idea, it seemed to me that elf-const.h was the appropriate direction to take.

   J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux