Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS (with new syscalls API) - new version

On Sat, 2007-06-30 at 19:13 +0200, Rodolfo Giometti wrote:
> Maybe I can define a special struct for exchanging time data as:
> 
>    struct pps_timedata_s {
>       long sec;
>       long nsec;
>    } 

Seems reasonable enough in principle -- but whatever you do, don't use
"long" for it. That would definitely need different behaviour for 32-bit
vs. 64-bit. Use explicitly sized types such as uint32_t or uint64_t.

-- 
dwmw2

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS (with new syscalls API) - new version
    • From: Rodolfo Giometti <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS (with new syscalls API) - new version
    • From: Rodolfo Giometti <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Is it time for remove (crap) ALSA from kernel tree ?
• Next by Date: Re: Is it time for remove (crap) ALSA from kernel tree ?
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS (with new syscalls API) - new version
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS (with new syscalls API) - new version
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]