Re: [PATCH 0/4] fbdev: uvesafb

On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 11:42:41AM +0100, Jonathan McDowell wrote:

> Have you considered using libx86[1] in v86d? It looks very similar to
> what you have at present and there are plans to extend it to non
> x86(_64) archs.

It looks like an interesting solution and it is indeed similar to what
I'm currently using.  I'll consider switching to it in the next version
of v86d.

Thanks,
Michal

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 0/4] fbdev: uvesafb
    • From: Michal Januszewski <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/4] fbdev: uvesafb
    • From: Jonathan McDowell <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH v2 5/5] uvesafb: documentation
• Next by Date: PM policy, hotplug, power saving (was Re: [PATCH] b44: power down PHY when interface down)
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/4] fbdev: uvesafb
• Next by thread: [PATCH 1/4] fbdev: make fb_find_mode look for a mode with the highest refresh rate
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]