On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 12:22:46PM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote:
> > Right, however many patches don't map to bug reports and don't
> > need the heavy use of BTS. This suggestion is mainly for the
> > improvement of peer review concerning code changes submitted
> > by people who are not the maintainers.
>
> Unfortunately you didn't listen, OK, just two messages:
>
> <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/544898>
> <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/545112>
>
> As you will see, nobody cares about comprehensive
> patches/tests/bugs/testers/developers *tracking* system.
>
> And don't limit yourself to fast conclusions. Thanks.
I am not proposing a comprehensive tracking system. I think
you are taking my intentions quite off-course.
--
Dan Aloni
XIV LTD, http://www.xivstorage.com
da-x (at) monatomic.org, dan (at) xiv.co.il
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
