On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 05:34:51AM +0300, Dan Aloni wrote:
>...
> Basically, instead of manually figuring out who to add to CC
> when sending a patch to LKML by looking at MAINTAINERS, a
> script can look at '.maintainers' files spread across the
> source tree and automatically generate a proper list of CCs
> for a patch.
>...
> To illustrate: If a patch affects a file under
> drivers/net/e1000, the CC script will look at these files
>
> drivers/net/e1000/.maintainers
> drivers/net/.maintainers
> drivers/.maintainers
> .maintainers
>
> ... to gather up the mailing list addresses or an individual
> maintainer inbox address.
>...
> Any comments?
As Auke said, maintaining the information in MAINTAINERS would be
better.
And another important use case that shouldn't require much extra work
would be to do the same for bug reports.
Generally, you should keep in mind that it must fit into the workflow of
the people who should use it. E.g. I could imagine that it might make
more sense if you write a small tool that takes a patch or a path and
outputs email addresses instead of a huge tool that tries to solve too
many problems at once and doesn't fit into the workflow of most people.
> Dan Aloni
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]