Re: [1/2] 2.6.22-rc6: known regressions v2

Alan Cox wrote:

I'm not even sure this report is IT8212 related rather than just an IRQ
storm

Why does the driver report "irq 0"?

ata7: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd <blah> ctl <blah> bmdma <blah> irq 0  <====

Above that, the ACPI layer says it assigned IRQ 20

Because the libata core code in 2.6.22rc6 reports all the ports and IRQ
values wrongly ?

AFAIK that was fixed, for IRQ. Please point out examples where it remains broken...

	Jeff



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [1/2] 2.6.22-rc6: known regressions v2
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [1/2] 2.6.22-rc6: known regressions v2
    • From: Michal Piotrowski <[email protected]>
  • Re: [1/2] 2.6.22-rc6: known regressions v2
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: [1/2] 2.6.22-rc6: known regressions v2
    • From: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>
  • Re: [1/2] 2.6.22-rc6: known regressions v2
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] cross-architecture ELF clean up
• Next by Date: [PATCH] pata_hpt3x3: support this chip properly including alternative BAR layout
• Previous by thread: Re: [1/2] 2.6.22-rc6: known regressions v2
• Next by thread: Re: [1/2] 2.6.22-rc6: known regressions v2
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]