Re: i386 boot fail, EIP in __change_page_attr:166

Dave Young wrote:

The diffrences is net520c item.

sorry it is netsc520, I will post the patch after a while.

I read your other mail out of order, and I'd forgotten about this oops. But still, the fix you posted doesn't look quite right. How big is the netsc520 ioremap?

   J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • i386 boot fail, EIP in __change_page_attr:166
    • From: "dave young" <[email protected]>
  • Re: i386 boot fail, EIP in __change_page_attr:166
    • From: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>
  • Re: i386 boot fail, EIP in __change_page_attr:166
    • From: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>
  • Re: i386 boot fail, EIP in __change_page_attr:166
    • From: "dave young" <[email protected]>
  • Re: i386 boot fail, EIP in __change_page_attr:166
    • From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
  • Re: i386 boot fail, EIP in __change_page_attr:166
    • From: "Dave Young" <[email protected]>
  • Re: i386 boot fail, EIP in __change_page_attr:166
    • From: "Dave Young" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Regression: 2.6.22-rcX: hda: lost interrupt
• Next by Date: Re: Is it time for remove (crap) ALSA from kernel tree ?
• Previous by thread: Re: i386 boot fail, EIP in __change_page_attr:166
• Next by thread: Re: i386 boot fail, EIP in __change_page_attr:166
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]