Dave Young wrote:
The diffrences is net520c item.sorry it is netsc520, I will post the patch after a while.
I read your other mail out of order, and I'd forgotten about this oops. But still, the fix you posted doesn't look quite right. How big is the netsc520 ioremap?
J - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- i386 boot fail, EIP in __change_page_attr:166
- From: "dave young" <[email protected]>
- Re: i386 boot fail, EIP in __change_page_attr:166
- From: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>
- Re: i386 boot fail, EIP in __change_page_attr:166
- From: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>
- Re: i386 boot fail, EIP in __change_page_attr:166
- From: "dave young" <[email protected]>
- Re: i386 boot fail, EIP in __change_page_attr:166
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: i386 boot fail, EIP in __change_page_attr:166
- From: "Dave Young" <[email protected]>
- Re: i386 boot fail, EIP in __change_page_attr:166
- From: "Dave Young" <[email protected]>
- i386 boot fail, EIP in __change_page_attr:166
- Prev by Date: Regression: 2.6.22-rcX: hda: lost interrupt
- Next by Date: Re: Is it time for remove (crap) ALSA from kernel tree ?
- Previous by thread: Re: i386 boot fail, EIP in __change_page_attr:166
- Next by thread: Re: i386 boot fail, EIP in __change_page_attr:166
- Index(es):
 |