Hi,
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > check_signature is relevant for anything with MMIO space (for example you
> > > can legitimately want to check_signature a MAC68K Nubus ROM).
> >
> > A generic check_signature() is a little difficult if we have separate io
> > functions for every bus.
>
> Does M68K implement iomap() and pci_iomap and friends yet ?
How is that related?
> check_signature has fairly few users so moving to be iomap based wouldn't
> be hard if that was a problem. The other option would seem to be
> bus->check_signature() ?
IMO the first question would be whether that function is really this
important. We can also just leave it as a PCI/ISA template and other bus
specific header can implement when necessary.
bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
