> I was mainly concerned with this being a new issue, and curious if
> Microsoft was calling an O/S bug a "microcode fix," given that the
> average Windows user doesn't know microcode from nanotech anyway. The
> non-answer from Arjan didn't answer either, and started by calling the
then ask questions?
Linux 2.6 is not affected.. what more is there to say? Regardless of
that as I said, Intel recommends always running the most current
microcode.
> I'd like the microcode update, some people elsewhere speculate that user
> level code could effect reliability if not security.
those "people" are speculating. Simple as that.
(oh and the microcode update is already there as I said... so what's the
problem?)
--
if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com
Test the interaction between Linux and your BIOS via http://www.linuxfirmwarekit.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
