On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 18:33 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > I think I misunderstood how lockdep works because the output was > actually wrong, should the key be part of the workqueue_struct as well? No, that's not right either, but Arjan just helped me a bit with how lockdep works and I think I have the right idea now. Ignore this for now, I'll send a new patch in a few days. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC/PATCH] debug workqueue deadlocks with lockdep
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH] debug workqueue deadlocks with lockdep
- References:
- [RFC/PATCH] debug workqueue deadlocks with lockdep
- From: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH] debug workqueue deadlocks with lockdep
- From: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
- [RFC/PATCH] debug workqueue deadlocks with lockdep
- Prev by Date: Re: New format Intel microcode...
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.22-rc6 spurious hangs
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC/PATCH] debug workqueue deadlocks with lockdep
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC/PATCH] debug workqueue deadlocks with lockdep
- Index(es):