Re: [PATCH] RFC: have tcp_recvmsg() check kthread_should_stop() and treat it as if it were signalled

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/28/07, Satyam Sharma <[email protected]> wrote:
[...]
[ BTW even there
we're safe as long as we check kthread_stop() _before_ flushing or
                                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Whoops, that should have been "kthread_should_stop()".

dequeueing the signals, but then that'll be an ugly rule to try and
enforce, of course. ]

Satyam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux