On Jun 27, 2007, at 23:57:54, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 06:30:52PM -0400, Kyle Moffett wrote:
Then all 64-bit archs have:
typedef signed long __s64;
typedef unsigned long __u64;
While all 32-bit archs have:
typedef signed long long __s64;
typedef unsigned long long __u64;
include/asm-parisc/types.h:typedef unsigned long long __u64;
For both 32 and 64-bit.
include/asm-sh64/types.h:typedef unsigned long long __u64;
include/asm-x86_64/types.h:typedef unsigned long long __u64;
So that's three architectures that violate your first assertion.
Oh, ok, that makes it even easier to say this with certainty:
Changing the other 64-bit archs to use "long long" for their 64-bit
numbers will not cause additional warnings. I'm also almost certain
there are no architectures which use "long long" for 128-bit
integers. (Moreover, I can't find hardly anything which does 128-bit
integers at all).
Cheers,
Kyle Moffett
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
