On Thu, 2007-06-28 12:39:57 +0200, Joerg Schilling <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > By the way, your mailer seems to be sometimes omitting In-Reply-To: and > > > > References: headers, which RFC2822 says you SHOULD include in replies. > > > > > > Sending such accusation without knowing the reason is not polite. > > > > It's not an accusation -- it's merely an observation. You may not have > > noticed that your mailer was misbehaving; now you _do_ know, and if you > > care about RFC compliance you might want to fix it. You're not _obliged_ > > to fix it, of course. I just thought you'd like to know. > > Well there you are: my mailer is definitely NOT missbehaving. > Please do not repeat similar accusations when not knowing the reason. Just out of interest: In which cases do you want to break threading? MfG, JBG -- Jan-Benedict Glaw [email protected] +49-172-7608481 Signature of: What we do for ourselves dies with us. What we do for the second : others and the world remains and is immortal. (Albert Pine)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Linux Kernel include files
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux Kernel include files
- References:
- Re: Linux Kernel include files
- From: [email protected] (Joerg Schilling)
- Re: Linux Kernel include files
- From: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux Kernel include files
- From: [email protected] (Joerg Schilling)
- Re: Linux Kernel include files
- From: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux Kernel include files
- From: [email protected] (Joerg Schilling)
- Re: Linux Kernel include files
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.22-rc6 on Dreamcast (SH4)
- Next by Date: Re: Some NCQ numbers...
- Previous by thread: Re: Linux Kernel include files
- Next by thread: Re: Linux Kernel include files
- Index(es):
 |