Re: [AppArmor 00/44] AppArmor security module overview

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Casey Schaufler <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 17:27:17 -0700 (PDT)

> --- David Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Neither of those are reasons why something should go into the tree.
> 
> They reflect the corporate reality of the open source community.
> If you're going to go down the "open source isn't for money"
> rathole please take it elsewhere. I've heard the arguments so many
> times I can sing them to the tune of "Lady Madonna".

That's a wonderful technical reason for apparmour to go into the tree.
Thanks for sharing and making it even clearer what is really behind
this submission.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux