On Wed, 27 Jun 2007, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> On 6/27/07, Hugh Dickins <[email protected]> wrote:
> > The absolute virtual addresses are randomized, yes; but do a sequence
> > of mmaps and they come back adjacent to each other, and so mergable.
> > Or does your distro include a kernel patch to randomize them relative
> > to each other?
>
> Each individual mmap is supposed to be randomized, yes. If this
> doesn't happen in one of our kernels right now something broken. You
> wouldn't have effective ASLR if all relative address remain the same.
Ah, I guess it's an exec_shield thing: vanilla kernel gives us
adjacent mmaps which are mergable. As Rik suggest, to make your
mmaps adjacent, use the mmap(addr,...) hint. (But please don't
then complain that they're not relatively randomized ;)
> > It _might_ turn out to be more attractive, not to rely on that
> > peculiar sys_remap_file_pages, but make all our vmas independent
> > of protections, and hang differently protected ranges off them.
> > Maybe.
>
> That's what I think is done or at least should be done.
Noted.
Hugh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
