On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 08:03:05 -0600
Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 02:55:00PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 05:30:48 -0600
> > Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > pci_get_bus_and_slot() shouldn't be used because it fails to work on
> > > systems with multiple domains. pci_get_slot() avoids this problem (and
> > > is much faster too).
> >
> > But requires you have a bus pointer to hand which is often not the
> > case. Do we need pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot() ?
>
> We have pci_find_bus(domain, busnr) which will get you the bus pointer.
So the answer is "yes" we should then, and move from pci_get_bus_and_slot
to pci_get_bus_domain_and_slot() [or just add an argument]. The point of
the functions is to be easy to use, so it should be handled internally.
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
