On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 12:16:50 -0700 (PDT)
Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, Ethan Solomita wrote:
>
> > The effect of this patchset is straightforward. Without it there are
> > long hangs between appearances of the date. With it the dates are all 5
> > (or sometimes 6) seconds apart.
> >
> > I also added printks to the kernel to verify that, without these
> > patches, the tee was being throttled (along with lots of other things),
> > and with the patch only pdflush is being throttled.
>
> That sounds good. Andrew: Any chance that we can get this patchset merged?
>
Is in my queue somewhere. Could be that by the time I get to it it will
need refreshing (again), we'll see.
One open question is the interaction between these changes and with Peter's
per-device-dirty-throttling changes. They also are in my queue somewhere.
Having a 100:1 coder:reviewer ratio doesn't exactly make for swift
progress.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
