Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 26 Jun 2007, Alexandre Oliva wrote:

On Jun 26, 2007, Al Boldi <[email protected]> wrote:

I read your scenario of the vendor not giving you the source to mean: not
directly; i.e.  they could give you a third-party download link.

This has never been enough to comply with GPLv2.

FWIW, it is one of the improvements in GPLv3.

either it's an improvement in the GPLv3 or it's a violation of GPLv2.

you can't say that the GPLv2 prohibits it _and_ it's an improvement in the GPLv3.

unless you are saying that the GPLv3 is saying that a third party link now _is_ sufficiant. this seems to be counter to what the FSF is claiming (with good reasoning. after all, you don't control the third party site, so it could change or go away and now the people who got the binaries from you can't get the sources)

David Lang

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux