Also the user interface for X server case needs more work.
actually with the mode setting of X moving into the kernel... X won't use /dev/mem anymore at all
(and I think it mostly already doesn't even without that) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Intel IOMMU 00/10] Intel IOMMU support, take #2
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [Intel IOMMU 00/10] Intel IOMMU support, take #2
- References:
- [Intel IOMMU 00/10] Intel IOMMU support, take #2
- From: "Keshavamurthy, Anil S" <[email protected]>
- Re: [Intel IOMMU 00/10] Intel IOMMU support, take #2
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [Intel IOMMU 00/10] Intel IOMMU support, take #2
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [Intel IOMMU 00/10] Intel IOMMU support, take #2
- From: Muli Ben-Yehuda <[email protected]>
- Re: [Intel IOMMU 00/10] Intel IOMMU support, take #2
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- [Intel IOMMU 00/10] Intel IOMMU support, take #2
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/7][TAKE5] fallocate() on s390(x)
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] trim memory not covered by WB MTRRs
- Previous by thread: Re: [Intel IOMMU 00/10] Intel IOMMU support, take #2
- Next by thread: Re: [Intel IOMMU 00/10] Intel IOMMU support, take #2
- Index(es):
 |