Re: [PATCH 1/2] Always probe the NMI watchdog

[Stephane Eranian <eranian@hpl.hp.com>]

Mikael,

On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 10:04:15AM +0200, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 23:04:25 +0200, B.Steinbrink@gmx.de wrote:
> > > I think the tricky part is that we do want to reserve perfctr1 even
> > > though the NMI watchdog is not active. This comes from the fact that
> > > the NMI watchdog knows about only one counter and if it can't get that
> > > one, it probably fails.  By reserving it from the start, we ensure NMI
> > > watchdog will work when eventually activated.
> > 
> > Can you enable it later on at all? It failed for me when I tried,
> > because it didn't know which hardware to use. Had to pass the kernel
> > parameter to make the proc files do anything. Seems like it has to be
> > enable at boot to work at all.
> > 
> > And AFAICT we never unconditionally reserved a perfctr for the watchdog.
> 
> Yes you can dynamically enable/disable the NMI watchdog,
> at least if you booted with it enabled.
> 
> > In 2.6.21 the nmi watchdog, if enabled, just reserved its perfctrs and
> > everything else had to deal with it. Since the cleanup, the watchdog
> > will release its perfctr when disabled, so another subsystem can grab
> > it. But that also means that that other subsystem must release it again
> > before you can reenable the watchdog.
> 
> Which is the obvious and correct way to handle a shared resource.
> 
Agreed.

> Keeping parts of the PMU HW permanently reserved whether or not
> the watchdog is enabled would be a BUG.
> 
True. But the upside is that you guarantee the activation of the NMI
watchdog will always succeed which may be a valuable property given the
goal of the NMI watchdog. Otherwise, if Oprofile or perfmon are active,
the NMI will fail to grab a single counter.

-- 

-Stephane
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/