On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 11:49 +0530, Abhishek Sagar wrote: > On 6/26/07, Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > We can then use that in register_jprobe() to check that the entry point > > we're passed is actually in the kernel text, rather than just some random > > value. > > A similar cleanup is possible even for return probes then. I wonder if > there are any kprobe related scenarios where the executable code may > be located outside the core kernel text region (e.g, ITCM?). In that > case would it also be wrong to assume that the jprobe handler may be > situated outside the kernel core text / module region? Would it then > make sense to move this check from register_jprobe() to the arch > dependent code? It did occur to me that someone might be doing something crazy like branching to code that's not in the kernel/module text - but I was hoping that wouldn't be the case. I'm not sure what ITCM is? > > int __kprobes register_jprobe(struct jprobe *jp) > > { > > + unsigned long addr = arch_deref_entry_point(jp->entry); > > + > > + if (!kernel_text_address(addr)) > > + return -EINVAL; > > Seems like you're checking for the jprobe handler to be within > kernel/module range. Why not narrow this down to just module range > (!module_text_address(addr), say)? Core kernel functions would not be > ending with a 'jprobe_return()' anyway. There's jprobe code in net/ipv4/tcp_probe.c and net/dccp/probe.c that can be builtin or modular, so I think kernel_text_address() is right. cheers -- Michael Ellerman OzLabs, IBM Australia Development Lab wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 21183) We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children. - S.M.A.R.T Person
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] Make jprobes a little safer for users
- From: "Abhishek Sagar" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] Make jprobes a little safer for users
- References:
- [PATCH 1/3] Make struct jprobe.entry a void *
- From: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 3/3] Make jprobes a little safer for users
- From: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] Make jprobes a little safer for users
- From: "Abhishek Sagar" <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 1/3] Make struct jprobe.entry a void *
- Prev by Date: Re: how about mutual compatibility between Linux's GPLv2 and GPLv3?
- Next by Date: Re: [Intel IOMMU 10/10] Iommu floppy workaround
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Make jprobes a little safer for users
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Make jprobes a little safer for users
- Index(es):