On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 14:15:36 +0900 (JST) Atsushi Nemoto <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 21:46:20 -0700, Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > + const static struct m41t80_chip_info *chip;
> > It's a bit weird that `chip' has static storage class here. Was that
> > deliberate?
> Oh the variable should not be static!
> I will send updated patch.
I'll fix it up.
> BTW, I reveived following mails:
> Subject: - rtc-watchdog-support-for-rtc-m41t80-driver-take-2.patch removed from -mm tree
> Subject: - rtc-add-rtc-m41t80-driver-take-2.patch removed from -mm tree
> Subject: + rtc-add-rtc-m41t80-driver.patch added to -mm tree
> Subject: + rtc-watchdog-support-for-rtc-m41t80-driver.patch added to -mm tree
> Are you going back to "take 1" patches? Why?
Stupidity, apparently. Will restore the take2 patches.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]