Re: [PATCH try #2] security: Convert LSM into a static interface

Oops, typo:

On Jun 26, 2007, at 00:09:24, Kyle Moffett wrote:

This sounds suspiciously like "The mere fact that the Linux-2.6-VM cannot be built as a module is a rather weak argument for disabling VFS modules as a whole"

Meant to say: "...disabling VM modules as a whole."

Cheers,
Kyle Moffett

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH][RFC] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
    • From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH try #2] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
    • From: James Morris <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH try #2] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
    • From: Andreas Gruenbacher <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH try #2] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
    • From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Patent or not patent a new idea
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] IOATDMA: fix section mismatches
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH try #2] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH try #2] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]