Re: [PATCH try #2] security: Convert LSM into a static interface

Oops, typo:

On Jun 26, 2007, at 00:09:24, Kyle Moffett wrote:

This sounds suspiciously like "The mere fact that the Linux-2.6-VMcannot be built as a module is a rather weak argument for disablingVFS modules as a whole"


Meant to say: "...disabling VM modules as a whole."

Cheers,
Kyle Moffett

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Re: [PATCH][RFC] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
  - From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
- [PATCH try #2] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
  - From: James Morris <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH try #2] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
  - From: Andreas Gruenbacher <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH try #2] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
  - From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Patent or not patent a new idea
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] IOATDMA: fix section mismatches
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH try #2] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH try #2] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]