Re: [PATCH try #2] security: Convert LSM into a static interface

On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:

> It's useful for some LSMs to be modular, and LSMs which are y/n options won't 
> have any security architecture issues with unloading at all. 

Which LSMs?  Upstream, there are SELinux and capabilty, and they're not 
safe as loadable modules.

> The mere fact 
> that SELinux cannot be built as a module is a rather weak argument for 
> disabling LSM modules as a whole, so  please don't.

That's not the argument.  Please review the thread.


- James
-- 
James Morris
<[email protected]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH try #2] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
  - From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: [PATCH][RFC] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
  - From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
- [PATCH try #2] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
  - From: James Morris <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH try #2] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
  - From: Andreas Gruenbacher <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.22-rc5-yesterdaygit with VM debug: BUG in mm/rmap.c:66: anon_vma_link ?
Next by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Convert all tasklets to workqueues
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH try #2] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH try #2] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]