Am 25.06.2007 19:06 schrieb Steven Rostedt: > On Mon, 2007-06-25 at 18:50 +0200, Tilman Schmidt wrote: > >> The Siemens Gigaset ISDN base driver uses tasklets in its isochronous >> data paths. [...] >> Does that qualify as performance sensitive for the purpose of this >> discussion? > > Actually, no. 16ms, even 8ms is an incredible amount of time. Unless > you have a thread that is running at a higher priority than the thread > that handles the work queue performing the task, you would have no > problems making that deadline. Ok, I'm reassured. I'll look into converting these to a work queue then, although I can't promise when I'll get around to it. In fact, if these timing requirements are so easy to meet, perhaps it doesn't even need its own work queue, and just making each tasklet into a work item and queueing them to the global queue with schedule_work() would do? Or am I getting too reckless now? Thanks, Tilman -- Tilman Schmidt E-Mail: [email protected] Bonn, Germany Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits. Ungeöffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe Rückseite)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Convert all tasklets to workqueues
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Convert all tasklets to workqueues
- References:
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Convert all tasklets to workqueues
- From: [email protected] (Jonathan Corbet)
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Convert all tasklets to workqueues
- From: Tilman Schmidt <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Convert all tasklets to workqueues
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Convert all tasklets to workqueues
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH try #2] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
- Next by Date: [PATCH] mtrr/cyrix: fix sections
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Convert all tasklets to workqueues
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Convert all tasklets to workqueues
- Index(es):