Re: [PATCH] cross-architecture ELF clean up

Hi,

On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, Clemens Koller wrote:

> > glibc provides its own version, so it doesn't has to be exported at all.
> 
> AFAIK the glibc folks want to rely more on the linux kernel headers
> in the future and not provide more or less redundant headers anymore...

In this case it's more an ABI header, it doesn't export any kernel 
interfaces.

bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] cross-architecture ELF clean up
    • From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] cross-architecture ELF clean up
    • From: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] cross-architecture ELF clean up
    • From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] cross-architecture ELF clean up
    • From: Clemens Koller <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Is it time for remove (crap) ALSA from kernel tree ?
• Next by Date: Re: Oops in a driver while using SLUB as a SLAB allocator
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] cross-architecture ELF clean up
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] cross-architecture ELF clean up
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]