On 2007.06.25 08:49:05 -0400, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Björn Steinbrink wrote:
> >On 2007.06.25 10:26:52 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> >>* Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>the winner is ...
> >>>
> >>> f8822f42019eceed19cc6c0f985a489e17796ed8 is first bad commit
> >>> commit f8822f42019eceed19cc6c0f985a489e17796ed8
> >>> Author: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
> >>> Date: Wed May 2 19:27:14 2007 +0200
> >>>
> >>> [PATCH] i386: PARAVIRT: Consistently wrap paravirt ops callsites to
> >>> make them patchable
> >>>
> >>and of course i'm happy to test any patch that is simpler than the
> >>brutal revert i sent.
> >>
> >
> >wrmsrl() looks broken, dropping the upper 32bits of the value to be
> >written. Does this help?
> >
>
> Crap. That's embarrassing. Does it help, because it seems likely?
> (Esp since Ingo didn't even have CONFIG_PARAVIRT enabled, so most of his
> revert would have been dead code anyway.)
He has. The config Ingo sent was for x86_64, which (AFAICT) doesn't have
CONFIG_PARAVIRT, so the config was unfortunately useless. But his
bootlog tells us:
Booting paravirtualized kernel on bare hardware
Björn
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
