On Sun, 24 Jun 2007, Ash Willis wrote:
kloczek,
The fact that it is now open source does mean that it's a suitable replacement.
If you actually want a productive discussion, you'd be better off making an
attempt at describing exactly _why_ ALSA is 'crap' and how in your opinion OSS
overcomes ALSA's shortfalls.
I'm asking .. and axpecting (only) answesr on my question.
*Each* day I have problems with ALSA support and I know some fundamental
ALSA misdevelopments and few times it was by me (and not only by me)
presented on lk-ml (try look on lk-ml archive) .. so .. sory but I'm not
interested on discuss about ALSA v. OSS :> (if you want disccuss about
this please prepare for this and read anything about subject .. before).
kloczek
--
-----------------------------------------------------------
*Ludzie nie mają problemów, tylko sobie sami je stwarzają*
-----------------------------------------------------------
Tomasz Kłoczko, sys adm @zie.pg.gda.pl|*e-mail: [email protected]*
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
