"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]> writes:
>
> OK, thanks.
>
> Eric, would you agree to follow this plan without making the entire CPU hotplug
> (on x86) depend on BROKEN?
Sorry for the delay, I missed this email. If we can actually move irq
migration into process context on x86. I would be happy to.
Currently I am dubious if this can be done reliably. But I think
the benefits of doing irq migration outside of the irq handler
are sufficient to give another go at making it work.
However this isn't just Intel's ioapics we have to worry about,
but Intel's were the worst so that is a reasonable starting point.
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
