Re: [RFC PATCH 6/6] Convert tasklets to work queues

[Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>]

On 06/22, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> > truct tasklet_struct, work);
> > > +
> > > +	if (unlikely(atomic_read(&t->count))) {
> > > +		pr_debug("tasklet disabled %s %p\n", t->n, t);
> > > +		set_bit(TASKLET_STATE_PENDING, &t->state);
> > > +		smp_mb();
> > > +		/* make sure we were not just enabled */
> > > +		if (likely(atomic_read(&t->count)))
> > > +			goto out;
> > > +		clear_bit(TASKLET_STATE_PENDING, &t->state);

Looking closer, I think this is not right, and the smp_mb__before_clear_bit()
can't help.


				/* t->count == 1 */

work_tasklet_exec()					tasklet_enable()

...

set_bit(TASKLET_STATE_PENDING);				atomic_dec_and_test(&t->count);


				/* t->count == 0 */


// False
if (atomic_read(&t->count))
	goto out;

							// True
							if (test_and_clear_bit(_PENDING))
								tasklet_schedule();


clear_bit(TASKLET_STATE_PENDING);

execute t->func();


So, t->func() will be executed twice because tasklet_enable() does
tasklet_schedule().


So I think we need a fix for work_tasklet_exec,

-		clear_bit(TASKLET_STATE_PENDING);
+		if (!test_and_clear_bit(TASKLET_STATE_PENDING))
			goto out;



Steven, a very stupid suggestion, could you move the code for tasklet_enable()
up, closer to tasklet_disable() ?

Oleg.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/