Tony Breeds wrote:
Thanks for taking the time to look over my patch.
I guess it's been based on the prior work by John Stultz (and me too :-)?
At some level I guess so. John did send me a patch a while ago.
If you mean the init. part, this has been already done by me -- I've
implemented read_persistent_clock() and got rid of xtime setting. What's
left is to implemet update_persistent_clock() and get rid of
timer_check_rtc()...
Actually I think that comment is redundant. and should be removed
sorry.
I guess you haven't looked thru the -rt patch? There's much more than
John's initial patch there now, including the clockevents driver.
+ .mult = 0, /* To be filled in */
+ .read = NULL, /* To be filled in */
+ .settimeofday = NULL, /* To be filled in */
I don't quite understand why not just init them right away? The values
are fixed anyways.
Well at least mult needs to be calculated at runtime, and I prefer to
I was talking about the method intializers specifically.
have the structure near the top of the file at which stage the
read/settimeofday functions aren't defined.
I don't think it's justified anyway.
Yours Tony
WBR, Sergei
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
