Re: [RFC PATCH 4/6] Make DRM use the tasklet is-sched API

[Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>]

On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 08:49 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 23:36 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 00:00 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > plain text document attachment (tasklet-driver-hacks.patch)
> > > Update the DRM driver to use the new tasklet API, which does not rely
> > > on the tasklet implementation details.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Index: linux-2.6.21-rt9/drivers/char/drm/drm_irq.c
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- linux-2.6.21-rt9.orig/drivers/char/drm/drm_irq.c
> > > +++ linux-2.6.21-rt9/drivers/char/drm/drm_irq.c
> > > @@ -461,7 +461,7 @@ void drm_locked_tasklet(drm_device_t *de
> > >  	static DECLARE_TASKLET(drm_tasklet, drm_locked_tasklet_func, 0);
> > >  
> > >  	if (!drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_HAVE_IRQ) ||
> > > -	    test_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &drm_tasklet.state))
> > > +	    tasklet_is_scheduled(&drm_tasklet))
> > >  		return;
> > >  
> > >  	spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->tasklet_lock, irqflags);
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > No sense in having a patch just for this, may as well merge this with
> > patch 3 ..
> 
> Wrong. patch 3 adds the API and this one makes use of it. Stevens split
> makes perfectly sense.

Clearly it doesn't make sense to me ;) .. The patches are too small to
split them up that way ..

Daniel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/