Re: [PATCH] x86_64: Fix misplaced `continue' in mce.c

On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 17:13:49 -0700 (PDT) Joshua Wise wrote:

> Testing:
>   On my system, I could replicate the bug with the following command:
>     # for i in `seq 15000`; do ./inject_sbe.sh; done
>   where inject_sbe.sh contains commands to inject a single-bit error into the
>   next memory write transaction.

Hi,

Does inject_sbe.sh require special hardware?  If so, what hardware
is it?

Thanks,
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] x86_64: Fix misplaced `continue' in mce.c
    • From: Joshua Wise <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Chinese translation of Documentation/stable_api_nonsense.txt
• Next by Date: Re: Oops in a driver while using SLUB as a SLAB allocator
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] x86_64: Fix misplaced `continue' in mce.c
• Next by thread: 2.6.22-rc5: pdflush oops under heavy disk load
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]